I was asked about Norway's licencing of in-ocean fish farms. They ceased to do this in 2014. Here is what I said to the query:
What
they [Norway] did was end the auctioning off of in-ocean licences in 2014 Norway was fed up with the sewage and other problems. This article
says, at the bottom, 66 million Kroner. Multiply it by the exchange rate .16
and you get $10.56 million: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy-construction/hurricanes-harvey-irma-lift-u-s-factory-activity-index-to-13-year-high-idUSKCN1C71RJ.
You
will find the $9- to $12-million figure I use in other articles. 80 million
Kroner is $12.8M, for instance. The BC licence cost, by comparison, is a
pitiful $5,000 or .04% of the $12M figure. Hence the reason we are subsidizing
fish farms to trash our oceans.
You
would have to check whether getting a licence [in Norway] is tied to a lease of a
particular spot. I don’t think it is. The reason for the high price is that
fish farms are a licence to print money, and so, there has been a long-term
speculative market, including people who had no intention of farming, just
resold the licences. Kjersti Sandvik’s book, Under
the Surface, covers this issue in Norway.
The
licences Norway gives out for on-land are free, and thus a $9 - $12-Million
subsidy. Note that the original licences are still in the water.
Norway
does issue some in-ocean licences for concepts that reduce environmental
damage, the egg by Marine Harvest, for instance: https://www.google.ca/search?q=Marine+Harvest+-+egg+concept+-+artist+rendering&dcr=0&tbm=isch&imgil=zEYXtZ5QezA_kM%253A%253B4IIbLOaEF_EL2M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Faquaculturenorthamerica.com%25252Fresearch%25252Fmarine-harvest-tests-closed-egg-shaped-fish-pens%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=zEYXtZ5QezA_kM%253A%252C4IIbLOaEF_EL2M%252C_&usg=__Z4pAEdxo9BPUjuR499EPgI3QEw0%3D&biw=957&bih=419&ved=0ahUKEwjVku_hwtLWAhVP0WMKHbYmD3kQyjcINQ&ei=H3_SWZWHFM-ijwO2zbzIBw#imgdii=DcHvMZQow-i0MM:&imgrc=zEYXtZ5QezA_kM:.
Note that the purpose is to save salmon from lice, and there are two pipes off
the bottom, one for water in, and the other would have to be for water/sewage/feed
flowing out, but that is something MH does not talk about.
Note
that the industry is trying now to get off shore, open ocean licences, for much
larger farms, presumably to keep them from public scrutiny and thus release far
more sewage. See this for Norway and Japan: Offshore Mega Sewage - Norway, Japan, offshore fish farms: http://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1077672/Norway%2DJapan%2DBegin%2DOffshore%2DSalmon%2DFarming.
As
for fish in a usual size farm, that would be 600,000 to 1,000,000, but you
would have to do some research to get a link.
D
No comments:
Post a Comment