When organizations like the David Suzuki
Foundation, Pacific Salmon Foundation, Watershed Watch Salmon Society and Save
Our Salmon Marine Conservation Foundation back out of DFO’s Integrated
Management of Aquaculture Planning Process (IMAP), you know it is time to once
again, as the $26 Million Cohen Commission did, point out that the federal
government has no interest in wild Pacific Salmon.
DFO is in conflict with fish farms, Marine
Harvest, Grieg Seafood, and Cermaq (which is currently being bought up by
Mitsubishi). Please read the letter of the BC based science organizations: http://www.saveoursalmon.ca/files/Conservation_and_Environmental_Groups_Regrettably_Decline_to_Participate_in_Flawed_Fisheries_and_Oceans_Aquaculture_Advisory_Process.pdf.
Here is a quote: “As conservation and
environmental organizations, we strongly support more rigorous oversight of the
aquaculture industry, better protection of the marine environment, and a
legitimate advisory process that might actually help DFO, industry and Canada
realize these goals. We also know that a large majority of British Columbians
agree with us. Sadly, after three years of meetings and written exchanges with
DFO, we were recently notified by DFO that the issues we have raised about the
process will not be addressed. Faced with entrenched positions and serious
flaws in both the IMAP and AMAC processes, we must decline to participate in
this “advisory” process.”
You will recall that more than 100,000
people have signed a petition to get fish farms out of the BC ocean and put on
land: http://www.change.org/p/restore-wild-salmon-ban-salmon-feedlots-in-bc.
BC citizens do not want fish farms in our ocean anymore, yet DFO continues its conflict
of interest supporting products that BC residents don’t want and don’t buy –
85% of the product has to be shipped out of Canada to the US because we don’t
buy it. And there are only 795 actual jobs in aquaculture in BC, that’s how
small it is. At less than $61 Million in GDP, (BC Stats paper (Get the PDF
here: http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/StatisticsBySubject/BusinessIndustry/FisheriesAquacultureHuntingTrapping.aspx),
fish farms will never be a substantial contributor to the BC economy, in GDP
terms.
As they quit, the science organizations said
this: “Our main concerns around the proposed AMAC terms of reference—and DFO’s
rigidity against implementing needed changes—lie mainly around the skewed
composition of the AMAC’s proposed membership, and the absence of any assurance
that the process will be informed by sound science advice being made available
to AMAC members and DFO regulators.”
DFO’s stocked the deck. On the committee,
9 seats were given to industry and industry aquaculture associations, only 3
for environmental organizations, and 2 for regional districts. Despite repeated
requests to balance the committee, DFO’s, Diana Trager, on April 14, 2014 said
no.
“DFO also rebuffed calls by us and
others to commit to broadening the science advice available to the AMAC. This
is a fatal flaw in the process, raising a significant risk that the advisory
process will be based on incomplete and potentially biased science advice…Indeed,
substantial evidence was tabled throughout the Cohen Inquiry into the Decline
of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River to support that DFO’s science advice on
the impacts of open net-cage aquaculture was overly narrow, often biased, and likely
skewed by the Department’s “conflicted” mandate of being both a regulator and
promoter of aquaculture.”
Twenty two of Cohen’s 75 recommendations
centred on fish farm environmental damage, and getting them out of the water,
and for DFO to be stripped of its conflict and get on with saving wild salmon.
“Justice Cohen took particular pains to
make a case that science advice on salmon conservation and aquaculture
regulation should be broadened to include outside academics and conservation
groups. That advice—not to mention most of the Inquiry’s other aquaculture
specific recommendations—have seemingly been forsaken by the federal government
in the” AMAC structure.
“Even while we continued to negotiate
these issues in good faith, DFO and Industry almost unilaterally proceeded with
the development of and adoption of what they call a "final"
Integrated Management of Aquaculture Plan that clearly sets out their own
agenda of Industry expansion—absent any real input from any of the other key
interests that have been invited to the table.”
The conflict continues. DFO does not
support wild BC salmon. A time is coming when BC will take back authority over
wild salmon, and get fish farms out of the water. I hope it is soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment