Cohen
Commission One Year Later
You may have thought the Cohen report was a stone
dropped through DFO leaving not a ripple. You’d be right. Google DFO Cohen
Commission and what you find is everyone else in the country commenting loudly
but diddly from DFO. Go directly to DFO and search, and the result is virtually
the same. Page after page of nothing about the Commission – a year of silence
so far.
At the time, DFO swamped the Commission with 500,000
documents. But after Cohen completed the intended sessions, the first result
for the Atlantic Ocean fish farm disease ISA was demonstrated in two wild sockeye
fry from Owikeno Lake, Rivers Inlet. Then one contentious document DFO failed
to give Cohen was leaked: a study showing ISA in dozens of wild BC salmon,
co-authored by Molly Kibenge, then with DFO in Nanaimo.
Cohen reopened the hearings and the full extent of fish
farm diseases cascaded out. The science experts Miller, F. Kibenge and Nylund
were interviewed. Miller’s work noted literally hundreds of thousands of fish
with ISA and HSMI in Clayoquot Sound farmed chinook and SLV phenotype ‘viral
signature’ back to 1988 in Fraser sockeye. Today there are only 501 wild
chinook in Clayoquot and up to 90% of some Fraser sockeye subcomponents die of
pre-spawn mortality.
With this knowledge in hand, the focus of the most
important recommendations in the 1200 page tome – 75 in total, pages 105 – 115,
Volume 3 – came to centre on constraining and removing Discovery Island fish
farms near Campbell River, and for DFO to relinquish its conflicting role of
supporting fish farms and put its full effort into implementing the 2005 Wild
Salmon Policy, and the 1986 Habitat Policy. The report says there should be a
new western director general charged with bringing back Fraser sockeye: http://www.cohencommission.ca/en/pdf/FinalReport/CohenCommissionFinalReport_Vol03_02.pdf#zoom=100.
Since then, the CFIA started a perfunctory
job of looking at a few thousand fish, and saying it could not find ISA – this
after Cohen testimony discredited its lab as not being able to find ISA. And
DFO? It’s moved on to aquaculture. The performance measure, wait for it, is: A transparent regulatory regime for aquaculture in
British Columbia and an Integrated Management Plan for finfish, and shellfish,
by March 2014.
And the latest Norwegian related fish disease has just
been shown to be present in BC wild salmon – PRV in Virology Journal, 2013.
This may be worse than ISA, as it is the virus associated with heart and
skeletal muscle inflammation – HSMI, developed circa 1999 in Norway. This is
what those yellow pink salmon and the dying pre-spawn Fraser chum and sockeye are
now being shown to have. Sadly, a large pre-spawn sockeye die-off occurred for
the first time in the Skeena River in the past couple of months.
You can support the cost of testing all these fish,
as hundreds of BC citizens, including me, are doing, on Alex Morton`s blog. She
has this to say: ``The Commission changed my life, I am tracking three
European viruses, publishing on them in top scientific journals and informing
the scientific community. Government is increasingly lagging behind and
irrelevant to the science on salmon.``
I understand that Miller and Riddell (CEO of the Pacific Salmon
Foundation), good smart people, will be co-authoring a report on fish farm/wild
diseases. Unfortunately, for them and us, fish farms, DFO, and CFIA will be
parsing the news releases.
dcreid@catchsalmonbc.com
DFO’s aquaculture initiative: The British Columbia Aquaculture Program: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/rpp/2013-14/SO1/so-rs-1.3.2-eng.html
Alex M`s blog: http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/alexandra_morton/2013/10/tracking-viruses-2013.html.
DFO
regarding BC Aquaculture:
http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/rpp/2013-14/SO1/so-rs-1.3.2-eng.html. Sub-program 1.3.2 -
British Columbia Aquaculture Program
Performance Measure. By
March 2014: A transparent regulatory regime for aquaculture in British Columbia
and an Integrated Management Plan for finfish, and shellfish.
Whole-genome analysis of piscine reovirus (PRV) shows PRV represents a
new genus in family Reoviridae and its genome segment S1 sequences group
it into two separate sub-genotypes
Molly JT Kibenge1†, Tokinori Iwamoto1†, Yingwei Wang2, Alexandra Morton3, Marcos G Godoy456 and Frederick SB Kibenge1*
Miller Summary on Watershed Watch: http://www.watershed-watch.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Exh-1523-CAN006145.pdf.
No comments:
Post a Comment