We should not be having to push Trudeau, but he has come out against wild Pacific salmon, and approved the Kinder Morgan pipeline, a huge fight that will come on the ground in the country, er province, of BC. His DFO minister Dominic Leblanc is against wild Pacific salmon and like the newbie he is refuses to get fish farms out of our - not Ottawa's - water, falling for the jobs and revenue spin, that has never actually happened in any of the more than a dozen countries where there are now fish farms.
After looking at the issues for four decades now, I would say the four major problems with wild salmon in BC are: habitat restoration, DFO, fish farms and climate change.
Habitat restoration is far and away the most important of the four because if there is no place to spawn, salmon are dead in the water. The most useful program is to increase the halibut stamp on sport licences to $24 with all of it going to the Pacific Salmon Foundation (PSF) because they can leverage every dollar between 4 and 7 times with the public and business who are willing to help. The take would be about $7.2 million.
If DFO just left the field, but gave the PSF an annual bump of $7.2 million and the province of BC matched it, the PSF would have $21.6 Million each year to leverage 4 to 7 times, which is a good beginning to real habitat restoration in BC. Just one item, there are more than 250,000 culverts on salmon bearing water in BC, about 70,000 requiring immediate action.
The other thing achieved by the matching funds is that control over habitat restoration would come back to BC where it has always been needed, rather than the far off nation of Ottawa.
In addition, you should know that the federal Parliamentary Committee on Fisheries and Oceans' report reviewed the Fisheries Act to reinstate habitat protection for fish. See: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=e&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8783708&File=9.
It made 32 recommendations. You may read them here: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=e&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8783708&File=156.
Or you may read them here:
[[And please go read an article from Hakai Magazine on these issues, particularly DFO not standing up for fish habitat: https://www.hakaimagazine.com/article-short/fisheries-and-oceans-canada-was-ignoring-its-own-habitat-protection-guidelines?utm_source=Watershed+Watch+Email+List&utm_campaign=d8b20e9fb1-Salmon_News_Apr7_2017&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_405944b1b5-d8b20e9fb1-166907249&mc_cid=d8b20e9fb1&mc_eid=5777c92bcd.]]
That section 35(1) of the Fisheries Act return to its wording as of 29 June 2012 which reads: “No person shall carry on any work, undertaking or activity that results in the harmful alteration or disruption, or the destruction, of fish habitat.” Remove the concept of “serious harm” to fish from the Act.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada take an ecosystem approach to protection and restoration of fish habitats so that the entire food web is preserved for fish by:
- Adopting key sustainability principles;
- Protecting the ecological integrity of fish habitat; and
- Protecting key areas of fish habitat.
Any revision of the Fisheries Act should review and refine the previous definition of HADD due to the previous definition’s vulnerability to being applied in an inconsistent manner and the limiting effect it had on government agencies in their management of fisheries and habitats in the interest of fish productivity.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada emphasize protection for priority habitats that contribute significantly to fish production within the context of section 6 of the Act.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada fund more research dedicated to ecosystem science.
That protection from harmful alteration or disruption, or the destruction, of fish habitat be extended to all ocean and natural freshwater habitats to ensure healthy biodiversity.
To protect fish habitat from key activities that can damage habitat, such as destructive fishing practices and cumulative effects of multiple activities.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada put sufficient protection provisions into the Fisheries Act that act as safeguards for farmers and agriculturalists, and municipalities.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada work with the farm community and rural municipalities to provide incentives and expert advice to conserve and enhance fish habitat and populations and utilize the enforcement approach as a last resort.
That permitting be expedited to allow for works that involve the restoration of damaged infrastructure and emergency works to protect people and communities.
That the Fisheries Act should include a clear definition of what constitutes fish habitat.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada assess and improve communications between fisheries stakeholders and the Department’s upper management and decision makers.
That communication within and between all levels of Fisheries and Oceans Canada be improved.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada clearly define the parameters of what is considered a violation of the Fisheries Act.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada should create a widely representative advisory committee to provide ongoing recommendation regarding the administration and enforcement of the Fisheries Act. The advisory committee should include but not be limited to, industry groups, project proponents, agricultural groups, municipal government representatives and commercial, recreational and Indigenous fisheries representatives.
To broaden the Minister’s mandate to consider long-term conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat when evaluating projects that contravene the Fisheries Act.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada provide the Committee with a report within two years after the revision to the Fisheries Act detailing authorization requests and decisions timelines.
That any changes to habitat protection in the Fisheries Act must be supported by a reduced reliance on project proponent self-assessment.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada put in place consistent monitoring requirements for proponents, with clear standards and rationale.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada make investments into a public and accessible database system that will identify:
- The location and status of projects that have been flagged by the Department of having a potential to cause harm to fish and fish habitat (authorizations, monitoring results and convictions) and their cumulative effects;
- The location of different aquatic species;
- Up-to-date monitoring of aquatic species at risk and their status; and
- The status of authorizations.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada ensure that significant investments are made in hiring more field personnel to improve fish habitat enforcement, to assist in fisheries enhancement projects and to establish positive consultative relationships with local communities.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada meaningfully resource the monitoring, compliance and enforcement components of the Department.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada increase enforcement staff on the ground by recruiting and retaining habitat monitors, including fishery officers who are dedicated to habitat protection.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada ensure that habitat protection staff are adequately trained and resourced with long-term funding and empower field staff to do their job to protect fish and fish habitat.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada re-establish the Habitat Protection Branch, adequately resourced to provide advice to proponents of projects that may impact marine and freshwater habitats and to enforce compliance.
Re-examine sections 32, 35 and 36 Fisheries Act authorizations as environmental assessment triggers.
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada continue to fund fisheries conservation and enhancement projects in co-operation with the Indigenous communities, the agricultural communities, and fisheries conservation organizations.
That the exercise of ministerial discretion be subject to transparency principles and public disclosure.
That the Minister, in the exercise of his or her discretionary power over licencing, may specify conditions of licence respecting and in support of social and economic objectives, in addition to the conservation objectives currently identified.
That any revision to the Fisheries Act should include direction for restoration and recovery of fish habitat and stocks.
That the Government of Canada address known regulatory gaps to ensure that Fisheries and Oceans Canada, in collaboration with all fisheries stakeholders, is capable of responding to all activities that are harmful to fish or fish habitat and is able to actually determine effect (e.g. ongoing collection of baseline data that allows determination of changes due to activities).
That Fisheries and Oceans Canada renew its commitment to the “No Net Loss” and “Net Gain” policies with a renewed focus, effort and resources on restoration and enhancement of fish habitat and fish productivity and that the Department allow project proponents flexibility to fulfill this requirement.
Update Feb 28, 2018: Ecojustiuces take on the new changes to fisheries laws: https://www.ecojustice.ca/ecojustice-recommendations-helped-contribute-modernized-fisheries-act/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=Impact_2018_02_28&utm_content=2018.02.28+Impact.