While
Nancy Greene has taken a stance to push in-ocean fish farms, there is a lot of
science that she likely does not know. And I doubt she realizes she is taking a
stand against wild BC salmon. The bullets from my article yesterday are
discussed here, with links for readers to go and read the documents and come to
their own conclusions.
It
would be good for Raine and the other senators to get a more balanced look at
the issues than what DFO and fish farms present. Nancy, please look at these
issues more closely, and then stand on the side of wild BC salmon:
“The Government of Canada should
remove from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans’ mandate the promotion of
salmon farming as an industry and farmed salmon as a product.”
This
is clear and unequivocal. Nancy Greene Raine and the other senators on the fish
committee need to read what Cohen said. His 75 recommendations are in Volume 3,
Chapter 2 and 3. Twenty two of them, almost a third, are about fish farms.
Governments, scientists and testing
systems are in conflicts of interest with fish farms. Staff and resources circulate from
the companies to governments, and monitoring systems deal with farms as clients
rather than being adversarial like police. Fish farms fund lots of research,
conflicting scientists. And Cohen evidence showed clearly that fish farms,
governments, both provincial and federal, and scientists are in conflict of
interest with one another. For example, Clare Blackman worked for the
provincial siting body, and now works for Marine Harvest. Cohen evidence shows
the Canadian Food Inspection Agency does not want to find ISA and other
diseases in farmed salmon. Their Moncton lab was shown not able to find ISA.
Fish farms aren’t about jobs and revenue. Fish farms says there is $800
million in revenue and 6,000 jobs in BC. This is not true. The only real
report, from BC Stats, ironically has DFO’s name on it but DFO does not say so,
shows categorically that fish farms result in few jobs and very low revenue. The Report says all BC aquaculture results in a measly
$61.9 Million in BC GPP, while the other parts of the fishing sectors – sport,
commercial, processing – contribute 600% more at $605.5 Million, a full 90% of
the contribution to GPP: http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/StatisticsBySubject/BusinessIndustry/FisheriesAquacultureHuntingTrapping.aspx.
When
you consider that the commercial sector has dropped 1,400 jobs since fish farms
set up shop, and wild salmon are down 50%, this strongly suggests that fish
farms don’t result in increased employment at all. Wild salmon disappear and
fish farms jobs replace those lost in other sectors.
Let
me add that the real number of actual jobs in fish farms is far below the
econometric analysis, with its multipliers, suggests. I was astonished to
sleuth out there are only 795 actual jobs in BC fish farming. That’s all –
nowhere near 6,000 – in fact there are only 13% of what they claim.
Almost
double the employment has been lost from the commercial sector alone. This
results in fewer processing jobs, and impacts sport jobs and revenues, too.
Let’s assume a marginal 10%: this means 840 jobs from sport’s 8,400 multiplier
jobs and 240 from processing’s 2,400, since 50% of the wild salmon died in the
presence of fish farms. See: http://fishfarmnews.blogspot.ca/2013/02/sport-fishing-how-we-tack-up-feb-6-2013.html.
And,
once fish farms set up lighting and feed machines, employment drops, and
herring and wild salmon have been lured into the nets at night, some eaten, and
some in the presence of disease and the ever-present lice. These are the
public’s fish, and they are the ones we care about. Lights out.
The
BC Stats report says all of
aquaculture has only 1,700 jobs only 1530 in fish farms. Add the loss in the other sectors together,
840 + 240 + 1,400, and the total realistic loss is 2,480 jobs in the rest of
the fishing sector. This strongly suggests that fish farms replace jobs they
eliminate rather than adding anything to the province’s job numbers. And do
remember this is not the actual number of jobs in fish farming – only 795, less
than half. We would have more than 300% more jobs in the other parts of the
fishing sector, if fish farms were eliminated and DFO took substantial action
on the Wild Salmon Policy as Cohen told them to.
Fish farms are not about jobs and
revenue. They are a boom bust industry. Most importantly, it is the workers
who suffer the job losses – the very people Raine seeks to employ. 13,000 to
26,000 workers lost their jobs in Chile circa 2008 from its ISA outbreak (63
workers were killed working at fish farms, too). And what do you do with a
quarter billion dead fish? Here in BC Marine Harvest let staff go just before
Christmas a couple of years ago. The problem? Kudoa, Marine Harvest lost
$12,000,000 last year to Kudoa. In fact, BC has way more of this parasite than
Norway.
The USA sales, 85% of BC farmed
fish, will go down, and BC farms will continue in their stagnant state
regardless of what they or DFO may want: the US has dropped a 26% duty on
Norwegian farmed fish, so the parent companies of the BC industry, are
aggressively selling into the market, thus ruining the sales of BC farms; the
parent companies of the BC industry have listed on the New York Stock exchange
looking for money to expand in the USA, against their own interests in BC; and
Chile has reached a peak of production, and virtually all is sold into the USA
market, further killing the BC industry, some of which is, again, the parent
companies of the BC industry. It is a boom bust industry, and the companies
play one country off against the other. They don’t really care what happens to the BC
industry as there is another 22 countries out there, for Marine Harvest, for instance.
Chile, as explained in this document, is using antibiotics to the level it did just
before the ISA crash in 2008. I follow global fish farm news so closely I am often
three to six months out in front of Oslo and Bloomberg brokers whose job it is
to forecast share prices.
On-land fish farms solve all the problems of having them in the ocean. Fish
farms say it can’t be done because of land cost, electricity cost and etc. This
is not true, they just want to continue using the ocean as a free, open sewer.
On-land recirculating systems use one tenth of the electricity by using a heat
pump. They use less land because fish tanks can be stacked one on top of the
other. And the fish are protected from all ocean diseases and their own
diseases are isolated from other fish, a huge improvement.
With
tank covers, the sewage methane can be collected, used to make electricity or
heat, and the excess put back into the grid to make money. Water temperature
can be set to maximum growth, unlike the ocean that varies all over the place,
hardly ideal. Same with optimal photo-period. The sewage can grow hydroponic
vegetables for cash. Or be composted and sold for cash. Recirculating the water
saves up to 98% of it. Putting in a current makes the fish line up and thus
more fish can be put in the tank, making even more money. In fact, I have a
list of 66 different on-land systems comprising more than 8,100 on-land fish
farms around the world.
Fish farm sewage costs are astronomical.
In-ocean
fish farms have high sewage costs–
for the expansions current 19,140 metric tonne, almost a billion dollars, at
$924 million. The cost for the current industry, is $10.4 Billion, and if they
used the full current authorized tonnage, it triples to more than $30 Billion
that the people of BC absorb, and thus pay for.
And
the senators want to triple the size of the industry? Nobody wants to pay for
the current sewage dumped into our ocean, let alone triple the tripled cost of
fish farm sewage. I have looked at sewage treatment in North America and
Europe, and it comes clear that no one wants to pay a bean for anyone else’s
sewage. Why would we pay for fish?
Fish
farms produce more sewage than the entire human populations of many countries,
Scotland and Norway included. It’s pretty even in BC, too.
Fish farms kill seals, sea lions,
and other animals. My estimate is 11,469 until 2011 – at least the ones they
count. Greene may not know that many of these sentient creatures drown and
realize they are drowning when they are caught in the nets. The rest are
humanely dispatched with a bullet through the head – if you think that’s
humane.
I
keep asking for the autopsy of that whale found dead in a fish farm net last
year on Vancouver Island, but DFO keeps telling me it isn’t available. Hmm.
And
in Skuna Bay where Grieg tries on the ‘we are sustainable, organic’ spin, 65
sea lions were killed and they got a fine for so doing of $100,000. So a sea
lion is worth $1,538 to DFO and fish farms. Many would say that should have
been the day all fish farms came out of the water. And, get this, they don’t
count otters, seagulls, eagles and so on. Watch this seagull die in a fish farm
net: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spdesooY2dY.
DFO’s own report shows that harbour
seals are basically extirpated where there are fish farms. As seals don’t
migrate more than 10 km, when the kill stats go down, it means local
extinction, not ‘nuisance’ seals moving on and fish farms not killing as many –
you cannot kill what you have already killed.
Fish farm diseases. There are several dozen fungal,
microbial and viral diseases. Because the fish are packed together, this
stresses them, cortisone is released which is an immune system depressant, and
then they pick up any old infection and among the million fish, it gets
reproduced so many times that it changes to a virulent strain and all the fish
die. Then taxpayers pay for them – $5.56 million for dead diseased fish in BC
last year - $50 million across Canada, last year. Government paid $135 million
of our tax money on the east coast since 1990. We don’t want to pay.
But
we care about wild fish. Here is an example: Dr. Kristi Miller, on the Cohen
record, showed that 25% of farmed chinook in Clayoquot Sound had both HSMI and
ISA (both are Norwegian diseases that should not be in the North Pacific – DFO
let them in on eggs). That is roughly 125,000 per farm. There are 22 farms in
Clayoquot Sound, and it is a UN biosphere reserve.
How
many wild fish are there? DFO’s number is a pitiful 501 chinook in six streams
in 2012 and the Kennedy Lake sockeye run was wiped out in the early nineties
and has not come back. Little wonder why. Same outcome for those Owikeno
sockeye in Rivers Inlet, where the first two ISA positives for wild sockeye fry
came from.
In
Chile, ISA resulted in Cermaq reportedly losing $323 million, while Marine
Harvcst lost 1.4 billion Euros. A quarter of a billion dead salmon. ISA is only
one disease. There is IHN, IPN, Kudoa, SLV, PRV, HSMI. The list goes on.
Cohen on fish diseases. When the two Routledge Owikeno
sockeye fry came back with a weak positive, and inconclusive from the Gagnon
lab in Moncton; with a positive, with more work needed from Are Nylund in
Norway; and, a positive on the same fry From Kibenge in PEI, DFO and the CFIA
were rocked.
Then,
thankfully, someone leaked a DFO report – the Kibenge report – showing ISA in
BC waters. DFO saddled Cohen with 500,000 documents but missed its own report
on the worst fish farm disease – they considered all results were false
positives – but should have sent the document to Cohen anyway, but did not.
DFO’s
scientist Kristi Miller and her viral signature work, showed that ISA was in
Fraser sockeye back to 1988 – and recently, some sockeye components died up to
90% on the spawning beds from PRV. Cohen reopened the already closed Commission,
strictly on fish farm disease issues, and out spilled all the evidence on fish
farm diseases, particularly, ISA and HSMI, (soon followed by PRV) and then IHN
in Clayoquot Sound last year, for which we the taxpayer paid multinational
billion dollar corporations $5.56 million for their diseased fish.
Incidentally,
Minister Ashfield, changed the Gagnon finding to negative – perhaps on the semantic
issue of having a virus does not mean having a disease. In other words he
mis-spoke, saying something he knew not to be true. He should have reported his
own lab’s words, and DFO ignores, in public, the Miller evidence and the two
world class labs of Nylund and Kibenge, finding the same thing.
Here
is the point: the North Pacific is the worst place in the world to have fish
farms. That is because there are 10 species of wild salmonids from California,
up through BC, Alaska and all the way down the west north Pacific shore to
Korea, perhaps a billion fish. Fish farms should not have been let in the water
here as now all those wild fish could be lost. More fish farms means Greene’s
support could help result in the biggest manmade fish disaster in history.
To
put such use in perspective, that is: 743,380 pounds of antibiotics. Disease
follows fish farms. ISA has pretty much been constant in Norway since the industry
fish changed a freshwater ISA virus to a virulent saltwater form in the
1980s. If you read global fish farm
news, you find that Chile is on the edge of another ISA disaster which they
don’t report on much – remember those ‘strict laws’, well, they tend not to
mention those in the same breath as the reports of ISA come in – but the
antibiotic use is the evidence of tonnes of disease.
Public opposition: There comes a point everywhere in
the world when the people realize fish farms kill wild fish, trash the ocean
and the people want them out of the water. This has happened in BC, NS, NB,
Scotland, Ireland, Norway itself, the Faroe Islands and will, shortly, in the
USA, in Maine. In Denmark they have already moved 50% of fish farms onto land.
I just received a request for my research from a newspaper in Tasmania,
Australia.
We
need, and our wild BC salmon and all the species that depend on them, need us
to get fish farms out of the water. If they want to set up shop on land and
control their problems, that’s fine, if they want to go home that would be
better. The Norwegian coast, is like BC, long fjords, and the genetic damage
has ruined the wild Atlantic salmon in rivers, and the sewage is so bad it is
more than all the people in Norway. Just as it is in Scotland and pretty much
the same in BC.
In
fact, the public being against fish farms has become a global movement with
citizens reaching out to find each other around the world and become better
informed. This is how I found out that in Atlantic Canada taxpayers, meaning
us, paid $135 Million to fish farms for their dead diseased fish – including
BC, the past year’s payment was over $50 million. No one wants to pay a dime of
our tax money on fish farms that kill their fish with disease caused by too high
density. They need to be on land. And the bigger the farms, the bigger the
problem.
In
the first week in April, 2014 Marine Harvest in Norway announced that it was
forgoing putting in smolts because it feared a full $4 billion loss with all
the fish dying from sea lice. This article was pulled from the internet in less
than a week (I know because I query other people who follow global fish farm
news and they confirmed this); then CEO Aarskog announced that sea lice were
the biggest problem in Norway, and for anybody with a solution to get in touch
with him asap. This is right now in 2014, the CEO of Marine Harvest, the same
Marine Harvest that operates in BC in 2014, right now.
Back
in Canada, in Nova Scotia, Cooke Aquaculture was done for using the illegal
lice chemical, cypermethrin for two years. When the news hit – facing a $33
million fine and up to 99 years in jail – Cooke said it wanted to study the
case evidence – a common fish farm tactic – and within a few months of silence,
the NS government gave Cooke $25 million for aid.
“33 serious
charges filed against Glenn Cooke & Cooke Aquaculture execs – $33
million fines and 99 years in prison possible – December 13 court date”
After receiving the $25
million, Cooke ultimately paid a $500,000 fine from Kelly Cove farms for using
illegal chemicals for two years. This kind of behavior, and money from
government, is all too common in fish farming in Canada. Read on.
But
first, in Chile, Cermaq lost 15% of its Atlantic salmon crop to lice circa
2012-13: http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/08/27/cermaq-results-salmon-idINL6N0GS1JB20130827. And Chile is openly acknowledged
as the dirtiest fish farm country in the world – increasingly moving south to
operate largely within the pristine Patagonia United Nations biospheres. In
main production areas to the north, the limiting factors are: disease, lice and
fish farm pollution. When production hits 650,000 mt no more fish can be grown
because ‘nature’ kills them all.
In
fact, the entire industry in Chile lost 15% of its crop in 2013 to lice: http://www.undercurrentnews.com/2014/02/06/chile-salmon-enters-make-or-break-year/.
At its peak level of 650,000 mt that means they lose more than the entire
harvest, and largest output ever recorded in BC, to lice. That is how bad sea
lice problems are. But the people of BC don’t really care about fish farm fish
deaths, we care about wild salmonids, and there are 10 species that can be
killed by lice – and other non-salmonids like herring.
So what is happening in BC? Here, DFO has announced that it will
drop from the already environmentally gutted Fisheries Act, S 36 – for
releasing deleterious substances into water – to give the fish farms the right
to try any chemical they want.
The
annual Norwegian cost to treat sea lice is $170 million and world wide over
$300 million. Cypermethrin kills lobsters – and that was how it was determined
that Cooke had been illegally using it in its Kelly Cove farms – as well as
other crustaceans, for example, crab and shrimp. Krill, shrimp-like
crustaceans, are the step above plankton in the wild salmon food chain in BC.
See: http://www.pesticide.org/get-the-facts/pesticide-factsheets/factsheets/cypermethrin. We don’t want them killed.
Do
note that the article shows that cypermethrin causes gene mutation, organ
abnormalities and cancers in mammals. The chemical is suspected to be
carcinogenic in humans.
The strictest laws in the world. You will find that governments and
fish farms around the world repeatedly use the phrase: ‘fish farms operate
under the strictest (or among the strictest) environmental laws in the world’
in the country in question, (when anyone complains about their environmental
damage). The claim is not true because, in the past year, fish farms have said
this in Chile, Scotland, Norway and Canada. As the laws are different in each
country, the claim cannot be true.
And,
of course, Chile is acknowledged as the dirtiest fish farm country in the
world, euphemistically referred to as having ‘sanitary problems’. Not to
mention that it may have laws, but that is a different thing from enforcing the
laws, for example, read fish farm news in Chile and you will find, that though
its chemical use is high, Chile does not report most cases of ISA.
In
Canada, the claim is even more untrue because the laws don’t apply all the way
across the country. There are different jurisdictions operative on the west
coast and on the east coast, both federal and provincial.
Furthermore,
in Canada, the claim is more untrue because the Fisheries Act and the Canadian
Environmental Assessment Act were both gutted a year ago in a federal omnibus
bill (an egregious occurrence in itself). But it is even worse than this.
Minister Shea and the DFO ADMs state in the senate video noted in this article,
that S 36 of the Fisheries Act – already gutted a year ago – will be further
gutted so that fish farms will be able to use whatever deleterious substances
they want – say, SLICE, cypermethrin, endosulfan, hydrogen peroxide – on lice
and for other reasons.
And
there has been a call for an Aquaculture Act, presumably to eliminate the
provincial laws, further weaken laws against the use of chemicals and permit
fish farms to use the ocean as a free open sewer, as they do now around the
world. Here’s another Canadian nuance: from time to time you will see the
Norwegian CEOs saying in the press that there need to be rules to deal with
aboriginals in Canada, meaning they don’t want to have to deal with each
individual First Nation. They want them rounded up, I suppose. Are they
cowboys?
There
is another issue: as soon as fish farms claim the laws are the strictest in the
world, they then use that as an excuse to argue that the laws are too strict
and to keep jobs and revenue in the country in a competitive world, the laws
need to be relaxed. Or they will move on, which they do anyway because fish
farms are a boom bust industry. Marine Harvest operates in 22 countries, and
disease takes one third to one half of all aquaculture animals, as noted in the
Kibenge presentation.
And
as I have said, the enforcement staff in BC are swamped with duties and few in
number. I may see one every five years or so in the field. And, of course,
laying off scientists means that other duties with respect to fish farms also
do not get done.
My
suggestion to Nancy Greene Raine is that she Google: fish farm environmental
damage, and start reading. She will find the information I mention in this
article. The other senators need to have their eyes opened as well. For
example, the most recent request I have had from world media, just a few days
ago, is from Tasmania, Australia. Local governments believe the ‘jobs and
revenue’ mantra, but the people are now reaching out around the world, to find
information because they want to stop the industry there. The movement is now
global.
I
suggest that someone who knows Nancy Greene Raine sit her down and tell her
that it is wrong to stand against wild BC salmon. And her name is going to be
badly tarnished by associating herself with fish farms. She should be on the side of the up to 90% of sockeye dying from
PRV on some Fraser tributary spawning beds, too diseased to spawn. Ask DFO to
stand by wild BC salmon, and eliminate fish farms from our pristine waters.
They sure don’t stand by wild BC salmon right now in 2014.
·
Just as this article
goes to ‘press’, the Namgis First Nation has announced it has just changed the
entire game for fish farming in BC and around the world. What terrific timing –
just as DFO was throwing open our pristine ocean for in-ocean fish farms and
their huge environmental damage, land-based Atlantics are now on stream and
selling for a premium as an environmentally safe product.
Our aboriginal friends are standing up
for wild salmon and our environment. This is one fish farm system that I, Nancy
Greene Raine and the citizens of BC can support. Well done Chief Bill Cranmer
and the Namgis First Nation, Port McNeill, BC. See: Link to News Release.
